Cross-Examination Made Simple (Part 1): The Fundamentals – Live Online CLE Webcast

"Cross-Examination Made Simple (Part 1): The Fundamentals" is a live online Continuing Legal Education (CLE) webcast designed to demystify the art of cross-examination for trial lawyers. Organized by Attorney Credits, this program offers a comprehensive breakdown of effective cross-examination techniques, emphasizing control, precision, and storytelling as foundational elements of persuasive advocacy. The course is scheduled for December 28, 2026, at 3:00 pm ET, providing attorneys with an opportunity to enhance their litigation skills through a structured, two-hour session.

The webcast covers key topics such as the fundamental purpose of cross-examination, the application of core rules like leading questions and disciplined questioning, and the importance of narrative in trial advocacy. Participants will learn strategies to maintain control over witnesses, structure testimony effectively, and utilize cross-examination to reinforce their case theory. The program also addresses common mistakes in cross-examination and offers practical methods to build sequences of agreement, guiding witnesses toward favorable responses. Additionally, the course explores how juror perception and courtroom dynamics influence the effectiveness of cross-examination.

Attendees will benefit from the expertise of Michael Deblis III, a partner at DeBlis Law, who specializes in tax compliance and entertainment law. With nearly eight years of experience as a public defender handling serious felony cases in New Jersey, Mr. Deblis brings a wealth of practical knowledge to the session. The webcast is accessible through various media options, including live streaming and downloadable formats, ensuring flexibility for participants.

This CLE webcast is ideal for both new attorneys and experienced litigators seeking to refine their cross-examination skills. By participating, attorneys can gain practical tools to conduct more effective, confident, and strategic cross-examinations, thereby improving their courtroom performance and avoiding common pitfalls that can weaken a case.